The goal of interaction: the construction of material Genesis.
Thus, now we dispose of two quite different particles. From the point of view of SRT and quantum physics, one particle, being in the state of rest, possesses great potential energy Å=Ìñ2
And in the state of active work it possesses energy
and the charge
. This active, Spiritual particle, having initial consciousness, - Quantum of light (electron). This active work is connected with the inner impulse of the particle.
The other particle, from the point of view of classic physics, in the state of rest possesses zero energy E=0
. And in the state of active work it possesses energy
. This active work is caused by external enclosed powers.
This passive spiritless material particle is proton.
The history of development of the surrounding us various material world starts with the interaction of these two particles. Because of interaction of spiritual and material nature, there appear vivid creatures. Thus, the problem of "consciousness- material", "spirit and body" that earlier defied solution and was a subject of fruitless argumentations, finds rational, logical, scientific substantiation.
* * *
Now they consider that there exist four kinds of interactions: gravitational, electromagnetic, and strong (atomic) and weak. And all the interactions between particles are imagined as original "game with balls". Some particles cooperate with others, exchanging certain third particles. For example:
1. The exchange of photons occurs in acts of interaction between electrical charged particles (electrons).
2. The connection between quarks is realized by transferences of gluons.
3. The connection inside the charge is realized by transferences of pi mesons.
4. Massive bosons are responsible for weak interaction.
And for demonstration of the nature of these interactions, they invented so called diagrams of Feynman. And here, for example, with such diagram, the interaction of electron and quantum of light is described:
And they explain this interaction in the following way:
1. electron e-
is pushed with quantum of light
2. electron absorbs it and continues the movement with the changed speed,
3. in some time, electron exhales the quantum of light and reconstructs the initial direction of the movement.
And interaction between two electrons is described by the following diagram:
That is, two electrons exchange quantum of light and with that they movement changed.
Dear reader! Are goal and sense of interaction really seen in such picture? To understand the interaction in nature as a simple exchange or of photons, or of quarks, or of pi mesons, or of bosons, or of other "balls" is primitive. If one applied this way of interaction to usual life, it would sound in the following way: "Interaction between two tennis players is realized by tennis ball. The theory does not provide the other interaction between them ". Unless only so to understand interaction it is normal? So to understand senselessly, because it is not clear how surrounding us the Reasonable Nature was built from these interactions.
* * *
At the beginning, L. de Broglie and W.Heisenberg aspired to prove the unity of different powers of interactivity, proceeding from divisible quantities of the constant of Planck h=1/2, 3/2, 5/2, 7/2
and so on. However, the problem remained unsolved.
Later the scientists began to unite the interactivity of powers in nature, relying on non-sizable constant
.. The physical meaning of the constant
. is not clear in the science now. Despite this, it is considered the basis of interactivities. In different kinds of interactivity, this coefficient
. has different meanings. And here, the scientists aspire to unite together these different meanings of coefficients. In 1979, the scientists created an abstract theory in which they united electromagnetic and weak interactivities. This idea results in that that electromagnetic field is a part of electrically weak field. And this electrically weak field, in its turn, consists of many components. Then they say that a convincing proof of the unity of electromagnetic and electrically weak interactivities is received in experiments.
What proof is found? There were found new particles (bosons), which are considered responsible for this interconnection. And where were these bosons discovered? Of course, on the accelerators. At the experiments, at collisions of coming from the opposite particles with great energies. They are abstract fantastic proofs of people that do not take into account the initial conditions of Genesis. And ahead the visionaries have more vast plans. After difficult mathematical calculations they have counted up, that all interactions in a nature "are united" at enormously high energies, and approve, that thus there should be new particles with mass 109
grammas. They approve that these particles are responsible for uniform interaction in a nature. And if to construct the appropriate accelerators, that is an opportunity to find out these particles. This purpose they called "the theory of great union".
At that they write: "Hardly one can hope that whenever so much high energies can be reached. Nevertheless, the principle of the unity of the combination of all the types of interaction itself is very important". That is they are sure that they go along the right road. It is a deep error. Not being aware of the initial conditions of Genesis, they go along "the trace of dinosaurs". One should stop them and quietly ask: "And what is the purpose of interaction?' "For the sake of what do interactivities occur in nature?" may be these questions will force them to think about the rightness of the chosen road. It is stupid to unite different single elements of interactions in one whole, letting them
through "mincing machine of high energies".
The purpose of association of interactions consists not in mixing them together. The goal of union of interactions is not for mixing them. The goal of union is to compose a chain that combines the goal and evolution of World development from different fragments of interactions. But if one does not know the initial conditions of Genesis occurrence, then it is impossible to understand the goal of interaction in nature.
* * *
How do spiritual particles enter in interaction with material nature? What explains all the interactions in nature?
1. The most important fundamental quality of the particle is its own rotation around of the diameter (the impulse of Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck) h . Transformational phenomena in nature are connected with this impulse.
2. The other important quantity in nature is non- sizable constant
Where from did coefficient of volume widening
In the theory of ideal gas, in the formulas of J.Charles and J.Gay-Lussac, there is coefficient of volume widening that is equal to 1/273
particles have the form of a circle.
As the theory of ideal gas, SRT and quantum theory are interconnected and analyze effect in Vacuum, then consequently, also coefficient of volume widening
indissolubly connected with quantum theory of charge creation.
Impulse of Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck- the particle rotating as sphere of some volume. The volume of this sphere is connected with the frequency of its rotation. The more electron rolls in sphere, the more high is its rotary frequency, the higher its energy is, the more its abilities.
3. It is clear that interactivities in nature must occur at some speeds. This speed depends on the impulse of Goudsmith-Uhlenbeck and is not rectilinear, but rotary with some cycle frequency
Then these three quantities are united "under one roof", "under one root", in one formula that makes charge:
All the interactivities in nature are realized by charge.
The charge is responsible for all the interactivities in nature.
* * *
Now physicists are convinced that the charge cannot disappear or appear, it is eternal, and they invented this law for that- "the law of preservation of electric charge". Proofs? Here you are!
Electron has minimally possible charge- consequently it does not have anything to fall into pieces on it, it means that it is static, it means that it is eternal. It means that there is no sense to argue any longer. But one needs to argue. Ii is necessary to ask: "Where from did this charge appear?" It is proved already that weight and energy of electron depends on speed that is electron is not static but is able to change. Consequently, charge is not a static quantity, but a changing quantity. And all the changes depend on the inner impulse of the particle.
* * *
When the scientists aspire to explain all kinds of interactions, proceeding either only from one constant, h, or
, without taking into consideration their interaction in some movement, this reminds me an ancient Indian parable about three blind people that study an elephant. One of them, while touching the elephant's feet, claimed that the elephant looks like a pillar. The second one, while patting the elephant's belly, claimed that the elephant looks like a ball. The third one, while grasping the elephant's tail, claimed that the elephant looks like a rope.
Logical method of knowledge, not taking into consideration interaction in nature, is abstract and may cause only laughter.
* * *
The scientists aspire to unit all four kinds of interaction in one kind.
It is considered, that this association is possible in any eleven-dimensional space. To three-dimensional of our world add eight invisible spatial measurements. Sad picture of modern thinking, when do not aspire to understand the entry conditions of Existence.
In 1916, German physicist A.Sommerfeld, while studying the structure of atom of hydrogen, found that spectral lines of atom undergo splitting to thinner lines. This splitting depended on some non-sizable coefficient that is equal to 1/137
. It was called as coefficient of constant thin structure.
Sommerfeld found his constant, proceeding from the formula
- the charge electron, is found by practical consideration.
- internal impulse Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck.
- speed (frequency) of rotation.
- characterizes intensity of electromagnetic process, characterizes effective section of electromagnetic process. These characteristics depend on volume borrowed by particle.
That is Sommerfeld has found one more constant making a charge
I must admit to myself, dear reader, that when I saw this formula, I stood stockstill in amazement and couldn't take off eyes from it. Then it struck me: "Really it is the formula of the charge
But mathematical description of the electron charge is not given in any textbook.
I understand with what it is connected. Electron charge (from the formula of Summerfield) one can rewrite in the way
and then it results that:
1. Or two states may be ascribed to the charge, one is positive and the other is negative, that is there exists charge state of the particle and its anti charge state.
2. Or there exist two charges, one is positive and the other is negative, that is one-charge and the other is anti charge.
How the modern science has found an exit from this situation?
* * *
Similar double state is observed also in the relativistic theory of the electron of Dirack. In 1928, English physicist Dirack formulated the equation of the electron that moves with the speed close to the light speed (relativistic equation of the electron). Analyzing this equation, Dirack concluded that there are two solutions corresponding to two differmeanings of the energy of the electron:
From the formula, it is seen that the particle can be in two states: positive and negative. Positive meaning of the particle it is clear, it is natural. But what does negative meaning of energy mean?
Dirack was in predicament. His theory was true, it explained spin and magnetic moment of the electron correctly. How then to explain the meaning of the negative meaning of the particle? And Dirack found way out. He invented hypothetical model, in which except real electrons, there exists also its antipode - twin antiparticle. They look like each other in everything, but although only their electric charge is equal, it is opposite in symbol. At this a strange and unusual condition was proposed: it was forbidden to real electron to meet its "negative relative", because in the time of their meeting, they mutually destroy themselves (annihilate them). Such a meeting of the particles looks fantastically.
The scientists, having created some specific conditions of the experiment found substandard behavior of the particles. But it does not mean that these particles will behave substandard in real conditions as well.
The theory of Dirack does not take into account the geometric form of the particle, that is why the essence of this theory is not clear completely and his conclusions are abstract. One would think that antiparticles must form antimatter but antimatter is not discovered anywhere in the Universe.
That is why the confirmation of Dirack that the formula
describes two different states relating to two different electrons, is logically not satisfactory.
The scientists created gigantic accelerators for the research of the structure of the elementary particle. On them (at vacuum conditions), they push together two elementary particles, moving with the speed close to light. And they build all their theoretical positions, proceeding from this process of collision exceptionally. And new elementary particles are discovered in the process of collision and with that simply fantastically picture is observed: two particles with the conditional weight of the car, while colliding, can create the particle with the conditional weight of the bus. The scientists call this strange process not destroying but a "creative one" and claim that they study the inner structure of the particles this way. It is nonsense from the lunatic asylum! While creating gigantic energies on accelerators (at vacuum conditions) and pushing the particles off there, it is possible to discover everything you like, because Vacuum is endless. But one needs completely different particles and different conditions in order to build earth planetary Genesis. It is interesting how many years it will take to the physicists in order to understand that it impossible to understand the inner structure of the elementary particle.
* * *
Coming to Egypt, I surely went to see pyramids first. Having paid for entrance, I started going up narrow inclined board to somewhere up. In some time, I got into big room and stood stockstill. The lamp shone dimly, illuminating sarcophagus in the middle of the room. A couple stood near it. Silently and slowly, I started approaching and very carefully peeped inside. And…and I saw an empty sarcophagus. I burst with laughter. My laughter rumbled in the empty room and the couple glanced at me in astonishment and fear and hurried to go somewhere. I could not stop. I laughed until tears went out. There was an Empire. There was Leader, Pharaoh, and God. Everybody trembled and bowed before him. One of the most important goals of his and of the society was to build pyramid. The whole country took part in this great project. Bosses ordered. Bureaucrats wrote. Inspectors watched. Slaves worked hard. Everything is for the sake of divine. And where is it? For what are these pyramids? On what were spent thought, energy and work of people?
And here I read about constructed gigantic accelerators of the elementary particles. And the picture of the constructors of the pyramids rises in my memory. But now I do not want to laugh. On what are spent thought, energy and work? Here are pyramids again. One false idea is replaced by the other lie. It is circulation of lie. Will not a person remain in the dark circulation of ignorance? Will not his wisdom shine with bright thought? Will not he realize the initial conditions of the Genesis? It cannot be so.
* * *
In the book " Evolution of physics " Einstein and Infeld wrote:
" We have the laws, but we do not know, what that body of readout, to which it is necessary them to attribute , and all our physical construction appears erected on sand. " Can be, the time has come to comprehend their words?