§ 8.
The explanation of interaction of quantum of
light
with material particle.
The goal of interaction: the construction of
material Genesis.
Thus, now we dispose of two quite different
particles. From the point of view of SRT and quantum physics, one particle,
being in the state of rest, possesses great potential energy E=Mc². And in the state of active
work it possesses energy
E=ħω
and the charge e=±√αħc. This active, Spiritual, active
particle, having initial consciousness, - Quantum of light (electron). This
active work is connected with the inner impulse of the particle.
The other particle, from the point of view of
classic physics, in the state of rest possesses zero energy E=0. And in the state of active work it possesses
energy E=mv²/2. This active
work is caused by external enclosed powers.
This
passive spiritless material particle is proton.
The history
of development of the surrounding us various material world starts with the
interaction of these two particles. Because of interaction of spiritual and
material particle, vivid creatures appear. Thus, the problem of
"consciousness- material", "spirit and body" that earlier
defied solution and was a subject of fruitless argumentations, finds rational,
logical, scientific substantiation.
*
* *
Now they consider, that four kinds of
interactions exist: gravitational, electromagnetic, and strong (atomic) and
weak. And all the interactions between particles are imagined as original
"game with balls". Some particles cooperate with others, exchanging
certain third particles. For example:
1. The exchange of photons occurs in acts of
interaction between electrons.
2. The connection between quarks is realized with
transferences of gluons.
3. The connection inside the charge is realized
with transferences of pi mesons.
4. Massive bosons are responsible for weak
interaction.
And for demonstration of the nature of these
interactions, they invented so called diagrams of Feynman. And here, for
example, with such diagram, the interaction of electron and quantum of light is
described:
And they explain this interaction in the
following way:
1. electron e is pushed with quantum of light γ,
2. electron absorbs
it and continues the movement with the changed speed,
3. in some time,
electron exhales the quantum of light and continuous its movement.
And interaction between two electrons is
described by the following diagram:
It means, that interaction
between two electrons is realized with quantum of light.
*
* *
In the
books it is written, that electrons interact among
themselves with the help
of a quantum of light. In the books it
is written that an electron in an atom passing
from one
orbit to another radiates a quantum of light.
It should
be understood as follows.
The electron has a quantum of light in a “pocket”
or under a "shirt"
which it gives
freedom from time to time.
Why is it necessary for the electron to hide a
quantum of light?
Dear reader!
Are goal
and sense of interaction really seen in such picture?
To
understand the interaction in nature as a simple exchange or of photons, or of
quarks, or of pi mesons, or of bosons, or of other "balls" is
primitive. If one applied this way of interaction to usual life, it would sound
in the following way: "Interaction between two tennis players is realized
by tennis ball. The theory does not provide the other interaction between them
". It is normal to understand interaction in such way ?
So to understand senselessly, because it is not clear how the
Reasonable Nature, surrounding us, was built from these interactions.
*
* *
At the beginning, L. de Broglie
and W.Heisenberg aspired to prove the unity of
different powers of interactivity, proceeding from divisible quantities of the
constant of Planck ħ=1/2, 3/2,
5/2, 7/2 and so on. However, the
problem remained unsolved.
Later the scientists began to unite the
interactivity of powers in nature, relying on non-sizable constant α. The physical meaning of the constant α is not clear in the science now. Despite
this, it is considered the basis of interactivities. In different kinds of
interactivity, this coefficient α has different meanings. And here, the
scientists aspire to unite together these different meanings of coefficients.
In 1979, the scientists created an abstract theory in which they united
electromagnetic and weak interactivities. This idea results in that that
electromagnetic field is a part of electrically weak field. And this
electrically weak field, in its turn, consists of many components. Then they
say that a convincing proof of the unity of electromagnetic and electrically
weak interactivities has been received in experiments.
What proof is found? New particles (bosons) were
found, which are considered responsible for this interconnection. And where
were these bosons discovered? Of course, on the accelerators.
At the experiments, at collisions of coming from the oncoming
particles with great energies.
They are abstract fantastic proofs of people that do not take into account the
initial conditions of Genesis. And ahead the visionaries have more vast
plans. After difficult mathematical
calculations they have counted up, that all interactions in a nature "are
united" at enormously high energies, and approve, that thus there should be new
particles with mass 10-9 grammas. They approve that these particles
are responsible for uniform interaction in a nature. And if
to construct the appropriate accelerators, that is an opportunity to find out
these particles. This purpose they called "the theory of great
union".
At that they write: "Hardly one can hope
that whenever so much high energies can be reached in experiments.
Nevertheless, the principle of the unity of the combination of all the types of
interaction itself is very important". That is they are sure that they go
along the right road. It is a deep error. Not being aware of the initial
conditions of Genesis, the scientists go along "the trace of
dinosaurs". One should stop them and quietly ask: "And
what is the purpose of interaction?' "For the sake of what do
interactivities occur in nature?"
May be these questions will force them to think
about the rightness of the chosen road. It is stupid to unite different single
elements of interactions in one whole, letting them
through "mincing machine of high
energies".
The purpose of association consists not in
mixing them together. The goal of union is to compose a chain that combines the
goal and evolution of World development from different fragments of
interactions. But if one does not know the initial conditions of Genesis
occurrence, then it is impossible to understand the goal of interaction in
nature.
*
* *
How do spiritual particles enter in interaction
with material nature?
What unites
all the interactions in nature?
1. The most important
fundamental quality of the particle is its own rotation around of the diameter
(the impulse of Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck- ħ).
Transformational phenomena in nature are
connected with this impulse.
2. The other important quantity in nature is
non- sizable constant α.
After impulse of Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck-
the particle began to rotate as sphere of some volume.
The volume of this sphere is connected with the
frequency of its rotation.
The more frequency is electron, the higher its
energy is, the more its abilities are.
3. It is clear that any interactivities in
nature must occur at some speeds.
This speed depends on the impulse of Goudsmith-Uhlenbeck and is not rectilinear,
but rotary with some cycle frequency ω.
Then these three quantities are united
"under one roof", in one formula that makes charge:
e=±√αħc.
Thus,
all the interactivities in nature are
realized by charge.
The charge is responsible for all
the interactivities in nature.
* * *
Now physicists are convinced that the charge
cannot disappear or appear, it is eternal, and they invented this law for that-
"the law of preservation of electric charge". Proofs?
Here you are!
Electron has minimally possible charge-
consequently it does not have anything to fall into pieces on it, it means that
it is static, it means that it is eternal. It means that there is no sense to
argue any longer. But one needs to argue. Ii is necessary to ask: "Where
from did this charge appear?" It is proved already that weight and energy
of electron depends on speed that is electron is not static but is able to
change. Consequently, charge is not a static quantity, but a changing quantity.
And all the changes depend on the inner impulse of the particle.
* * *
When the scientists aspire to unite all kinds
of interactions, proceeding either only from one constant, ħ, or α, without taking into consideration their interaction in some movement,
this reminds me an ancient Indian parable about three blind people studing an elephant.
One of them, while touching the elephant's foot,
claimed that the elephant looks like a pillar.
The
second one, while patting the elephant's belly, claimed that the elephant looks
like a ball. The third one, while grasping the elephant's tail, claimed that
the elephant looks like a rope.
Logical method of knowledge, not taking into consideration interaction of these constants
in nature, is abstract and may cause only laughter.
* * *
The
scientists aspire to unit all four kinds of interaction in one kind.
It is considered, that this association is possible in any eleven-dimensional space.
To three-dimensional of our world they add eight invisible spatial measurements.
Sad picture of modern thinking, when they do not aspire to understand
the entry conditions of Existence.