§6.
The explanation of some consequences,
resulting from active work
of the quantum of light.
If the particle was in the state of rest and then obtained
rotary movements on a place around of its diameter because of inner impulse,
the initial energy of it increases:
E=E0/Ö1-(v/c)2
But this formula of energy bears general
character.
And concretely energy of a particle is possible
to understand in such way.
As a result of an internal impulse ħ=h/2π
the particle rotates with frequency
ω.
Then the
product of sizes ħ and ω characterizes concrete
energy
of a particle: Е= hw/2p = ħw.
Schematically
this process can be displayed so:
E0=M0c2
E=ħw
The
particle rotates with speed more than speed of light quantum c=1.
It explains huge frequency of particle ,s rotation.
/ Tachyon
theory./
One can
analyze this process and from the other sight.
Under the work of the impulse of Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck, the particle starts rotation with some
definite angle speed, making incorrect sphere of some volume.
This volume is characterized on coefficient of
volume expanding that is marked by the letter α. Then production of three
quantities:
h - the impulse of Goudsmit-Uhlenback,
α - coefficient of volume widening,
c - speed of impulse rotation.
Make a new physical parameter of the particle that is characterized as
the charge:
е2=ħac
or е=±Öħac
If the particle first worked as the charge and
then it began to move with the speed of light, then schematically this process
will be reflected in the following way:
е=±Öħac E=hc
If the particle first worked actively and then it came to the state of
rest, then schematically this process will be reflected in the following
way:
е=±Öħac E0/M0=c2
The particle can be in three states and all these three states are interconvertible. Schematically, all these three conditions
may be united by one chain of formulas:
E=Mc2 E=hc e=±Öaħc
The direct arrow points out that the particle
acts under the influence of the impulse of Planck. This process occurs quietly,
parameters of the particle do not change abruptly, homogeneousness of Vacuum is
not disturbed. The curve arrow points out that the particle acts under the
influence of the impulse of Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck. Now a
cardinal change occurred of all the parameters of the particle. The
environmental space also has changed.
These formulas logically and clear explain how
charge forms that creates electrostatic field.
*
* *
Let's consider once again, as the charge is
formed.
In 1916, German physicist A.Sommerfeld, while studying the structure of atom of hydrogen, found out that spectral lines of atom undergo splitting to thinner lines. This splitting depended on some non-sizable coefficient a that is equal to 1/137.
It was
called as “fine structure constant”
Sommerfeld found this constant, proceeding from the
formula a=e²⁄ ħc.
The charge electron was found by consideration experimental.
And Sommerfeld has
found one more constant which makes the formula
of electron charge е2=ħca.
I must admit, dear reader, that when I saw this
formula, I stood stockstill in amazement and couldn't
take off eyes from it. Then it struck me: "Really it is the formula of the
charge e²=ħca".
But mathematical description of the electron
charge is not given in any textbook in such way.
I understand with what it is connected. Electron charge one can rewrite: е=±Öħac
and then it results that:
two charges exist, one is positive- charge
and the other is negative - anti charge.
How the modern science has found an exit from
this situation?
*
* *
Similar double state of the particle is observed
also in the relativistic theory of the electron of Dirack.
In 1928, English physicist P. Dirack formulated the
equation of the electron that moves with the speed close to the light speed
(relativistic equation of the electron). Analyzing his equation, Dirack concluded that there are two solutions corresponding
to two different meanings of the energy of the electron:
E=±Mc2
From the formula, it is seen that the
particle can be in two states: positive and negative. Positive meaning of the energy
it is clear. But what does negative meaning of energy mean?
Dirack was in predicament.
His
theory was true, it explained spin and magnetic moment of the electron
correctly. How then to explain the meaning of the negative meaning of the
particle? And Dirack found way out. He invented
hypothetical model, in which except real electrons, there exists also its
antipode - twin antiparticle. They look like each other in everything, but
although only their electric charges are equal, it is opposite in symbol. At
this a strange and unusual condition was proposed: it was forbidden to real electron
to meet its "negative relative", because in the time of their
meeting, they mutually destroy themselves (annihilate them). Such a meeting of
the particles looks fantastically.
The scientists, having created some specific
conditions of the experiment found substandard behavior of the particles. But
it does not mean that these particles will behave substandard in real
conditions as well.
The theory of Dirack
does not take into account the geometric form of the particle, that is why the
essence of his theory is not clear completely and its conclusions are abstract.
One would think that antiparticles must form antimatter but antimatter is not
discovered anywhere in the Universe.
That is why the confirmation of Dirack that the formula
E=±Mc2 describes two different states, relating to
two different electrons, is logically not satisfactory.
The scientists created gigantic accelerators
for the research of the structure of the elementary particle. On them (at
vacuum conditions), they push together two elementary particles, moving with
the speed close to light. And they build all their theoretical conclusions,
proceeding from this process of collision exceptionally. And new elementary
particles are discovered in the process of collision and with that simply
fantastically picture is observed: two particles with the conditional mass of
the car, while colliding, can create the particle with the conditional mass of
the bus. The scientists call this strange process not destroying but a
"creative one" and claim that they study the inner structure of the
particles this way. It is nonsense from the lunatic asylum! While pushing the
particles in Vacuum it is possible to discover everything you like, because
Vacuum is endless. But one needs completely different particles and different
conditions in order to build earth Genesis. It is interesting how many years it
will take to the physicists in order to understand that it impossible to
understand the inner structure of the elementary particle.
One more way of the research of the elementary
particle is to study it in the chamber of
Gigantic constructions: accelerators and
chambers of
*
* *
Coming to
And here I read about constructed gigantic
accelerators of the elementary particles. And the picture of the constructors
of the pyramids rises in my memory. But now I do not want to laugh. On what are
thought, energy and work spent ? Here are pyramids again. One false idea is
replaced by the other lie. It is circulation of lie. Will not a person remain
in the dark circulation of ignorance? Will not his wisdom shine with bright thought?
Will not he realize the initial conditions of the Genesis? It cannot be so.
*
* *
Therefore, negative meaning of energy of the
electron in formula E=±Mc2 and its charge in formula е = ± Ö ħ a c means
that it can transform from one energetic condition into the other. At this, all
his physical and geometrical parameters change. Changes occur according to the
transformations of Lorents. Here is a schematic chain
of this process:
E0/M0=c2
E=hc E=ħw
or
E0/M0=c2 E=hc e=±Öaħc
From the chain of these formulas it is clearly
seen three states of one and the same particle:
a) in the state of rest. E=Mc²
b) in the state of movement E=hc
c) in the state of active work E=ħw e=±Öaħc
This process is interconvertible.
This chain of formulas reflects one of the most
important laws of physics-Law of preservation and transformation of energy.
This law points out the ability to produce different transformations and after
that to return to one of its initial states. This law shows the ability of the
particle to rule over the energy by transforming it for different goals. And
the essence of all phenomena that occur in nature is connected with the ability
of the particle to transform its energy. The essence of the law of preservation
and transformation of energy is in it.
Nowadays, the law of preservation and
transformation of energy is received in physics as a simple bookkeeping
calculation of debit-credit. It is a primitive judgment about one of the most
important Law in Nature.
Why?
Because debit-credit
is “ a bookkeeping symmetry law”.
And the
life begins with disturb of symmetry. The occurrence of Life is connected not
with symmetry, but with breaking of
symmetry.
For
something to happen there has to be a "broken symmetry".
This law is not maintained indeed in the
conditions of macro world. But in the conditions of micro world, this law of
preservation of energy is disturbed. And then the scientists "save"
it inventing new particles. Example of it is abstract "theory β
disintegration". The phenomenon of
β
disintegration is explained as arbitrary utterance of electrons by
nucleus of radioactive elements.
And in this process the disturbance of law of
preservation of energy is found.
All the theorists - physicists were puzzled.
Then the most brave of them N. Bohr suggested to "refuse the idea of
energy preservation". But physicists are conservative people and they
cling to old ideas with all their might.
And here one of them, Swiss physicist W. Pauli, gaining to preserve the law of energy preservation,
suggested that at β disintegration one more neutral
particle that takes away insufficient energy, should take part. E.Fermi has named this particle neutrino.
It is
interesting to note, that physics affirm, that neutrino is very similar to the quantum of light,
does not
have mass of rest.
I offer to consider process β - disintegration in another way.
Electron, originally taking place in atom, is
released (makes quantum conversion) under the circuit:
E=ħw E=hc « E0/M0=c2
This chain is explained in the following way:
1.Electron
E=ħw
liberates
from the nucleus of atom.
At this
the curve arrow denotes that the impulse of Goudsmih-Uhlenbeck
changes.
Electron
gradually changes its form of sphere, its energy (E=ħω) also changes gradually .
2.And later on electron flies as quantum of
light (circle) E=hc.
The direct arrow denotes that electron moves
uniformly rectilinearly
under the influence of the impulse of Planck.
3.And after the uniform rectilinear movement
can be replaced
with a
condition of the rest E0/M0=c2.
So, first Dirack invented antiparticles in 1927. Then Pauli "discovered neutrino on the end of pen" in 1929. The theorists of physics liked their idea to explain unclear qualities in the phenomena, discovering new particles (to transfer pain from sick head into a healthy one). And they started to discover the whole anti micro zoo of elementary particles with the construction of these accelerators. And when an unclear quality just appears, they seek new elementary particle, which can explain these unclear qualities.
But how to find it?
It is very simple - one should increase the power of accelerators. And physicists indulge in fancies that it would be great to build accelerators with diameter that seizes our whole planet of Earth. These are nonsense ideas. It is possible to increase the power of accelerators and consequently one can find some new particles. But is our planet word built from them?
Vacuum is endless and is not empty. And
aspiration to know it by the method of construction of more powerful
accelerators is the way of "stupid infinity" it is "a trace of
dinosaurs" which leads to dead end. This way will not explain the inner
structure of the particles.
*
* *
The wish of the scientists to understand the
picture of Existence is great. That is why aspired to understand the structure
of micro particle, they created new abstract theory "quantum chromo-
dynamics", "quark model" in 1963. According to this model, elementary
micro particles consist of three smaller particles that received the name of
quarks: up, down and strange. Three anti quarks correspond them. They all
possess fractional charge. With the help of different combinations of these
particles, they succeeded to explain series of phenomena and to predict the
existence of new particles. These new particles were seen on the accelerators
after that that they succeeded to increase their power. But the explanation of
the qualities of new particles demanded to introduce the fourth quark into the
theory, called charmed. Anti quark corresponds it. With the help of it, they
succeeded to explain the qualities of these particle.
One
could think that quark model is perfect. However, the power of the accelerators
increased and a new particle was discovered, the qualities of which did not
find room in four-quark model. Then the scientists introduced the fifth quark,
called beauty and with the help of it, they explained the qualities of new
discovered particles. But powerful accelerators still increased and increased
and new particles were introduced. In order to overcome difficulties in
explanation of qualities of new particles, they had to introduce a new quark:
truth.
Then they gave a conventional name:
"color". Now each quark can have three varieties of colors:
"red", "blue" and "yellow". Besides, in order to
keep quarks together, interaction between them should be carried out with the
help of eight other particles-gluons. They carry powers of interaction between
quarks. And with all that, it is claimed that it is impossible to watch quarks
gluons in a
Quark theory is not completed. It is possible
to increase the power of accelerators. And then new particles will be
introduced. For their explanation, one would have needed to introduce a new
quark- the sixth one. I think it would have received the name "sexual",
and would have had two varieties: masculine and feminine. With this, the theory
would be completed. And if some exceptions from the rule appear, it would be
necessary to ascribe it to the interference of "sexual minority".
They always spoil a good idea.
In physics, it was regarded as a tradition that
an obligatory condition of a good theory was a small number of parameters. But
judging by the quark theory, physics got sick with "parametric disease",
i.e. for the explanation of conditions of each new particle, new parameters are
introduced. And with the help of such a method, one can explain everything he
wants.
*
* *
Let us analyze again electric field that is
connected with electron:
- In "motionless state", i.e.
rotated locally at the same place electron creates electric field. Its
energy is equal E=ħω. During rotary movement, geometric
form of electron is spherical.
- If at some moment of time, the charge
starts its movement, and that will bring to the change of its spherical
form. It becomes the same as of ellipsoid, flattened in the direction of
movement. At the same time with this, electric field starts deformation.
It looses spherical symmetry and becomes ellipsoidal.
- The further uneven movement of electron
accompanies by deeper deformation of electric field. The spherical field
will be transformed to an ellipse field.
And in process of his removal the ellipse
field is more and more became narrow and extended.
And in a limit (at the moment of breaking-off
) the electron gets the form of a string.
/String theory /.
Therefore, electron
can have the different geometrical forms:
circle,
ellipse, sphere , string.
- When electron further on moves
independently with the light speed c=1,
Electric field stops its existence.
Thus, electron and quantum of light is the same
particle,
which
can be in different states.
At present time it is considered that quantum
of light and electron are two different particles.
But the physicists themselves claim that
experimentally an amazing phenomenon is observed for quantum of light with high
frequency that transforms into electron.
In his book " Isaac
Newton " Soviet academician S. I. Vavilov wrote:
" For photons with extremely fast fluctuations,
superior the certain meaning, on experience
the remarkable phenomenon of transformation them in … electron is observed.
Undoubtedly as well returned process is. "
But the process of this transformation is not
comprehended by them completely.
*
* *
In Bible,
it is said that God created light on the first day of creation and Sun only on
the fourth one. About what light is it spoken in Bible? About what initial
particles and quanta of light is it spoken all the time in this book? The
matter is not in material particles, coming from light sources, such as Sun or
lamp.
The speech
goes about more than 90% of the invisible matter named "latent
mass", which under the statement of the scientists exists in the Universe.
But nobody knows that this represents "latent mass".
Other
scientists approve, that in the universe exist, so-called, relict (primary)
photons. They approve, that on one material particle (proton) it is necessary
approximately 109 relict photons.
A difference is great. This "latent
mass", these primary photons are initial particles and are considered in
SRT and Quantum theories.
*
* *
Vacuum is inhabited by the particles that, by
the expense of their inner impulse, can:
or rest E0/M0=c2
or move E=hc,
or rotate around their axis E=ħω.
Thus, physical qualities of the particle depend
on the inner impulses occurring in it. For the accomplishing of these actions,
the particle must possess germs of wisdom, consciousness. The Divine particle
possesses this consciousness. And consciousness of this Divine particle cannot
be static, it develops "from vague wish to bright thought".
Thus, these particles are born, like
children, with the developing consciousness. They live infinitely long. But who
was born must die sooner or later. But then a question arises: "What gave
birth to these Divine particles?"
It is clear that these particles that possess
consciousness, can give birth to something more conscious. And when you realize
this fact, you stand stockstill in deep silence before
something Great, Infinite, Immense, Conscious that defies the grasp, which
hides behind absolute temperature T=-273,16ºC.
In ancient religions, they call Vacuum
"Great emptiness" and characterize as Non-genesis that causes
Genesis. This Genesis is characterized in Hermetic by words: "The Universe
is something intellectual". Great emptiness is the source of the whole variety
of Genesis. Now physicists only obliquely and abstractly admit the influence of
Vacuum on Material Genesis. Then there are all the possibilities for deeper and
more concrete understanding of perception of the structure of Vacuum.
*
* *
In different times, different religions,
different philosophers called the initial particles in different ways:
Plato-idea, Leibnits- monade,
Kant- "the thing in itself" and so on.
With the development of the science within
classic physics, there was not place for the explanation of inner (vivid)
power. But with the creation of SRT, quantum mechanics and atom theory, the
scientists had to introduce new terminology. And here they entered such new
notions into the science:
- particle with mass/energy of rest,
- particle of the imaginary quantity,
- antiparticle,
- neutrino,
- particle with the "defect of mass",
- particle with "energy of
connection",
- virtual particle,
- tachyon.
Under these
different names and definitions, the same the only essence is hidden-particle E=mc².
It has the ability to transform into other forms of energy:
E=hc,
E=ħω, e=±Öaħc
The goal of
this transformation is creation of material Genesis.
Conclusions.
By virtue of my strength and abilities, I tried
to explain the initial conditions of Genesis simply and accurately as
multiplication table.
H. Hertz joked: "Formulas are cleverer
than people", because the essence of formulas was not clear. Einstein once
said that a scientist does not think by formulas. It was said in connection
with "paradox"-dualistic behavior of the particles. But thanks to formulas,
equations and laws, a person perceives the picture of Genesis. The picture of
Genesis is not paradox; consequently, both formulas and laws of nature cannot
be paradox. It is our humane logical thought is paradox, when it cannot
understand or accept the initial conditions of Genesis and the essence of
quantum of light. When we realize this, we objectively and logically can
understand the picture of Genesis, owing to formulas, equations and laws.
Reader, please read and analyze critically:
§1. Physical state of the Universe is Vacuum that
is characterized
by absolute quantity T=-273,16ºC.
§2. Vacuum gives birth to the resting particles:
C/D=p R/N=k E0/M0=c2 h=0 i=Ö-1 t»¥
§3. At some moment, the resting passive
particles starts vibrating around its axis like pendulum h=1/2.
§4. At some moment because of the impulse of
Planck, the particle starts moving uniformly, rectilinear with constant speed.
h=1 c=1=const M=E=hc=kβc M≠0
Such movement does not disturb rest and
homogeneousness of Vacuum.
§5. Because of the impulse Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck ħ=h/2p,
transformations of Lorentz occur to the
particle and in consequence of that its geometric and physical parameters
change.
E1=E0Ö1-(v/c)2 С/D¹p С/D<pÖ1-(v/c)2
M1=M0Ö1-(v/c)2 t1=t0Ö1-(v/c)2
the particle becomes the charge е=±Öaħc
that possesses energy E=ħw
the particle actively works, creating
electrostatic waves
l=ħ/mv l=ħ/mc ( limiting
case)
§6. If the particle can be in three states and in
dependence of these circumstances, can decide itself in what of three states it
should be, it means that it is necessary to ascribe it conscious origin. This
consciousness cannot be still. It develops and evolutes "from vague wish
to bright thought".
§7. Then to the question: ""What gave
birth to these Divine particles?" you understand that something more
Conscious could cause them. Something more Absolute, Great, Infinite, Immense,
Conscious which hides behind absolute temperature T=-273,16ºC.
And then it became clear, why ancient Egyptians
wrote in sacred tractate:
"The Universe is something
intellectual". It becomes clear, why they ascribed creative origin to the
Great Emptiness in religions of Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism. It becomes
clear, why severe logical analysis confirms the rightness of ancients, who
said:
"There is Great Emptiness
and nothing sacred in it".
But then, expressing already their subjective
humane opinion, they added:
"But we, people like flowers
and avoid thorns".
Such logical explanation of the initial
conditions of genesis is clear also to a schoolchild and to any thoughtful
reader.
*
* *
About 2300
year ago a great Aristoteles divided the knowledge of
nature into two parts:
physics
(science of nature), and metaphysics ( science staying before physics).
How strange
it is, he is right.
The theory
of ideal gas, SRT, Quantum theory are the part of physics (metaphysics),
which
describe the structure and behaviors of the particles in Vacuum, then there is
not still material Existence.
And physics
begins only when it is explained, how material particles and whole
material
Existence are greeted from these initial particle in Vacuum.
*
* *
Dear
reader! Einstein once said that God would not miss the possibility to build
world in the easiest way. And really, the initial conditions of genesis turned
out to be quiet simple, because the world develops from simple to complex.
However, a critical reader has the right to ask the author: "And where
from did material particles appear?" "Where from did beautiful
material Genesis that surrounds us appear?" in the following paragraphs I
will try to give the answer to this question. My answer is schematical,
but I hope, that the experts can more particularly explain occurring process.