§ 4.

 

The explanation of occurrence of activity of quantum of light,

The formulas of active work of quantum of light ,

follows, that it obtains consciousness.

 

(Back to Contents)

 

Thus, as it is known, at the beginning God created light. But, unfortunately, he did not explain to anyone how he did it. The scientists themselves had to solve this mystery of occurrence of light. For all that, almost simultaneously two opposite theories of qualities and structure of light emerged.

Isaac Newton knew that light possesses both corpuscle and wave qualities.

But he preferred corpuscle theory. He thought that light consists of particles (corpuscle), because such an obvious notion easily explained the most elementary fact: its rectilinear dissemination. Only because of that during the whole XVIII in physics corpuscle theory reigned, although not absolutely.

However, a contemporary of Newton, Dutchman physicist H.Huygens in his thesis "Treatise about light" (1690) proposed the other idea- the wave theory of light. This theory explained many effects, which the corpuscle theory was not able to explain. That is why, gradually, forcing the theory of Newton, almost all the  XIX- th century there reigned wave theory, although not absolutely.

The XX-th century came, and it brought the quanta of Planck and Einstein. Again, the corpuscle theory claimed its rights on the reigned position. But the wave theory was quite strong to withstand its aggressive intentions. The result of the battle between them was a draw. The tired scientists, describing that battle, did not see the winner and that is why decided that quantum of light has a dual nature (dualism). It is also the particle (corpuscle) and, together with that, possesses the wave qualities. In 1924, Einstein concluded:

 "So, now we have two theories of light, both are necessary and, as we have to admit today, existing without any logical interconnection, in spite of twenty years of great efforts of the physicists - theoreticians ".

Not twenty years but centuries physicists searched for logical interconnection between these two theories. A particle and a wave are two different objects in nature. A stone, thrown into water, creates waves. It is clear. But the stone itself cannot be the wave. The wave is derivative from the stone's activity. And in the case of quantum of light it is ascribed its contradictory unity. Nobody could explain such dual nature. Gone to extremes by the unsolved riddle, N. Bohr decided to turn “evil of contradiction” into “kindness of complementarily”.

 "Who earlier mutually excluded each other, will add each other", he decided

Bohr was so sure in truth of his It is a simple "principle of complementability ", while receiving the rank of nobleman and personal coat of arms for the scientific merits, he took Chinese symbol YIN and YANG with the inscription "Opposites add each other" for the emblem of the coat of arms. There were not strict proofs with that, the principle was counted as a philosophical one. In the course of time, more and more researchers agreed with this principle. But the principle of Bohr is not wise because it aspires to unite objects that exclude each other and is not desired to those, which disturb the critical search of truth.

German scientist M. Born also aspired to find the way that allows to fit on the notion about particles and waves. As a connecting link among them, he saw in a probable approach. He explained the interconnection between the particle and wave with the probable psi-function (ψ). It allowed coordinating the theory with the experiment in a wonderful way. But it is impossible to imagine this wave connected with psi-function (ψ) as something material. It was one more attempt to understand the essence of quantum of light.

 But Einstein always underlined that probable interpretation is correct but it does not reflect the reality completely. He said that under probable interpretation there must be hidden deeper essence. He wrote:

 "I still believe in the possibility to create a model (theory), that will be able to expose the essences themselves and not only probabilities of their manifestations".

Just such a theory that exposes "the essences themselves" is revealed on the pages of this book.

In all the textbooks of physics is written that elementary particles (quantum of light, electron) possess "complex inner structure". How do the scientists imagine this "complex inner structure" of the particle? They do not have the answer to this question. The criterion of elementariness is not still fixed. It is clear, that elementary particle already cannot consist of other particles. Then of what does "complex inner structure of elementary particle" consist?

Some scientists say that "the complexness" is connected with the transference of this elementary particle into other elementary particles and give the example: if particle will take a run to the speed of light on accelerator and to push it with other elementary particle, the appearance of new elementary particles is seen. It is a mad, violent method of knowledge that does not explain the inner structure of the particle.

Some scientists see the complexness of the inner structure of the elementary particle in its geometrical form. That is why recently they started to develop toroidal model of quantum of light. According to toroidal model, the quantum of light represents a ring in the form of tore (cracknel). It is claimed, that with the help of this model, one can explain all the famous light phenomena: both corpuscle and wave. However, this hypothesis does not take into account interaction a psrticle with Vacuum, in which the notion of "volume" is excluded. And a flat cracknel in Vacuum is a very complex figure, which demands to take into account many additional powers. Toroidal model is purely mathematical abstraction. If one would not take into consideration the initial condition of Genesis, but analyze arbitrary mathematical models, then, as it is known, a “famous horse Pegas hovered in the sky”. And we really see it in the cartoons.

*     *     *

Corpuscle qualities of quantum of light are shown at the impulse of Planck  h=1.

At such an impulse, the quantum of light moves uniformly-rectilinearly with

the constant speed c=1.

But light has also wave properties. How to explain occurrence of this property?

The simple movement of the quantum of light does not reflect all its qualities completely. Therefore it is possible to assume, that quantum of light has one more kind of movement.

In what is this movement special?

The feature of the quantum of light is that it sends its inner impulse not along its circumference. Now the quantum of light transfers its impulse (the center of gravity) to the edge

 of the circumference under some angle α to its plane.

 

                                                           

                                                     a                                                 

                                                                         

                                            A               0               B                                

 

 

                                                 a - the angle impulse of the particle

  AB - diameter

This impulse is center-impetuous power, directed to the center of rotation.

 Because of this action, the particle, remaining in its place, exits from the condition of balance and obtains rotatory movement (spin) around its diameter AB. All the square of the

 circle S=π rotates around its diameter. This rotation is local (in its place) and is not connected with the movement of the particle. At this rotation, the form of the circle changes to the form of the sphere. Now the correlation C/D is already smaller than π: C/D < π.

Once more, I will underline that this inner impulse is caused not with external powers; this is innate quality of the particle.

As a result of rotation, not only geometrical form of the particle changes but also its physical parameters. These changes mathematically are reflected in transformations of Lorentz.

It is assumed now, that the transformations of Lorentz are connected to rectilinear movement of a particle. It is wrong.

The correct answer to it has been given only in 1925 by the Dutch physics S. Goudsmit and G. Uhlenbeck. They came to conclusion that micro particles must possess own rotated movement, which they called "spin" that means "to rotate". Just this impulse causes the rotation of the particle, which is described by the transformations of Lorenz.

Later, other physicists (W. Pauli and P. Dirack) confirmed this idea. Now this fact (the rotation of the particle around its diameter) is the law. In any textbook on physics it is said that spin is inner quality of the particle, that it is its own angle moment, own moment of impulse. This impulse is describe with the formula:  ћ = h/ 2 π.

Thus, everyone recognizes, that there is an inner impulse of a particle .In one cases they speak about a impulse Planck h, forcing a particle to move uniformly-rectilinearly.

In other cases it is spoken about an impulse Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck ћ = h/ 2 π, forcing a particle to rotate around his diameter. But now scientists do not understand deep qualitative distinction between these two kinds of action. I explain essence of these two inner impulses and distinctions between them. Thus, dualism of a particle is not a riddle any more. It is solved.

*      *      *

So, we have an elementary particle. It is quantum of light that possesses complex inner structure. The complexness of this inner structure is connected with changes of its geometrical form under the influence of its inner impulse. Thus, quantum of light can be in three conditions:

    a) in the condition of rest

      circle - C/D=π    impulse-   h=0

     b) in the condition of uniform-rectilinear movement c=1

      form - ellipse  impulse-      h=1

     c) condition of rotation (spin)

      form - sphere (geoid)   impulse  ћ = h/ 2 π

 

Quantum of light is in Vacuum. Nothing influence on it. It is independent and decides alone in which of the three conditions it wants to be. And the ability to make decisions independently when and in what conditions it would be witnesses the presence of consciousness in the particle. This consciousness cannot be frozen. This consciousness develops "from vague wish to bright thought" to manifestation. Such explanation seems incredible to our modern world. It does not enter both scientific and religious frames of the modern world outlook. The people, who have devoted to a science, were sure that they analyze and open only material soulless particles. And suddenly it turned out (whether they wanted it or not) that formulas, equations and laws on the level of micro world describe the processes in Vacuum connected with Conscious, Spiritual, Living particle. It is very difficult to change points of views formed from childhood. The only hope is on the critical logical wisdom of a person who possesses courage to throw away both scientific and religious prejudices in the aspiration to know the truth.

 

*    *    *

The most important fundamental quality of the particle is own rotation of the particle (impulse Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck). Transformation phenomenons in nature are connected with this rotation. Great physicists of the past felt and understood it. That is why, for the first time, a French physicist L. de Broglie undertook explanation of existence of various particles, proceeding from rotatory (spin) impulse of the particle. He concluded that "combining" particles with half-integer spins, it is possible to receive the variety of elementary particles. And out of them de Broglie mathematically combines other wave functions. Approximately, after 30 years in 1958, W. Heisenberg reanalyzed this idea. He dreamed to prove the unity of various powers of interactions, proceeding from one power - half-integer spins. As a result, he created the system of not linear differential equations (not linear spinier theory). The idea of this theory is that the excitement of the field itself appears not because of interaction with other fields but because of interaction with itself. However, the solution of this not linear differential equation of Heisenberg is connected with such mathematical difficulties that until now they did not succeed to receive a final result. And they add that "some obviousness is out of the question ".

Isn't it nonsense?

Just concerning this work of Heisenberg, N. Bohr said: "We have a mad theory in front of us. The question is if it is mad enough to be true". Why did Bohr call this theory mad? Because to ascribe the particle self-action (self-excitement) means to ascribe it germs of wisdom and will power. The particle decides itself when to get excited, when to start action.

 And to ascribe consciousness, wisdom and power to elementary particles seems to be madness for the modern scientific world. From the school bench, a person is taught that physics is a science about unlively nature. And suddenly we have to admit that on the level of micro world physics studies living particles that possess consciousness. But if we will follow up the history of physics, we will see that such point of view did not always exist. At the beginning, the scientists divided powers of material into two kinds: living and unliving. But gradually not finding living, innate power, they forgot about it.

However, now SRT and Quantum theory return us to the idea of living innate power. These theories claim that to the particle "its own impulse" is peculiar, with the help of which it can act. Thus, the idea about living, spiritual particle like the bird Phoenix revives again in the unit of SRT and Quantum physics.

*     *     *

Now the scientists describe the birth of quantum of light in such a way: physical Vacuum,

they say, is "not an empty space", although there is none real particle in it, there are

"virtual particles" there.

Besides, in Vacuum, they say, "null vibration of electromagnet field" exists.

If the energy of this “null field” changes into excited state, then, one quantum with the energy E=ћω" appeared in space. There is lack of concreteness in this general idea and that is why scientists try to get rid of this state in some way. And they invented such "scientific formulation": every virtual-quantum particle is connected with vacuum state by means of correlation

y1=a+y0

.

y1- the condition of quant particle (of the field)

a+ - operator of the birth

Ψ0-vacuum's state

It is a very good formula. The problem is that essence of the birth of the particle from the Vacuum remained ciphered. Physical essence of the operator of the birth is not clear. The birth of new physical state of the particle remained unopened. Again simple general "formula puzzle" is given, not explaining the concrete details of the birth of the particle.

*      *       *

The basis of the scientific bible consists of classic mechanics, thermodynamics, SRT, and quantum physics. The first law of Newton is abstract in classic mechanics. In thermodynamics, they do not understand the Theory of ideal gas. In SRT, they do not understand pseudo-Euclid space. In quantum physics, they are afraid of Infinity. And thermodynamics, and SRT, and quantum physics, analyzing micro world, claim that they are not interested in inner structure of the particle. Is there a need after that for the representatives of the science to complain of the misunderstanding and nonsense of the Picture of Genesis? If the logical wisdom of a person wants to understand the reality, he should begin to reason from Vacuum: T=0K.

 


2003-2008 @ Copyright Israel Sadovnik
טכנאי מחשבים תל אביב